Skipping SpamAssassin if sender is on an RBL

[Richard Frovarp]

Vlad Mazek wrote:
> Nope, still gets processed by MailScanner:
>
> Feb  7 17:18:45 MailScanner[18224]: RBL checks: m17M9lxS016045 found 
> in SBL+XBL
> Feb  7 17:18:46 inbound42 MailScanner[18224]: SpamAssassin cache hit 
> for message m17M9lxS016045
> Feb  7 17:18:46 MailScanner[18224]: Message m17M9lxS016045 from 
> *MailScanner warning: numerical links are often malicious:* 
> 75.63.44.11 <http://75.63.44.11> (ka at creativeholidays.com.au 
> <mailto:ka at creativeholidays.com.au>) to rmel.org <http://rmel.org> is 
> spam, SBL+XBL, SpamAssassin (cached, score=23.378, required 5, 
> autolearn=disabled, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 0.50, 
> RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100 1.50, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 1.50, 
> RAZOR2_CHECK 0.50, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 2.19, RCVD_IN_XBL 2.90, 
> STOX_REPLY_TYPE 0.00, TVD_FINGER_02 2.72, URIBL_BLACK 1.96, 
> URIBL_JP_SURBL 2.86, URIBL_OB_SURBL 2.13, URIBL_SC_SURBL 2.52, 
> URIBL_WS_SURBL 2.10)
>
> Notice that it still passes it through SpamAssassin.
>
> I have the the following in my MailScanner.conf:
>
> Spam List = SBL+XBL
> Spam Lists To Be Spam = 1
> Spam Lists To Reach High Score = 1
>
> -Vlad

Actually, that one didn't get passed through SpamAssassin. It hit the 
cache. Not sure how that is handled differently. What version of 
MailScanner? What are your High Scoring Spam Actions?