Skipping SpamAssassin if sender is on an RBL
v at vladville.com
Thu Feb 7 22:21:59 GMT 2008
Nope, still gets processed by MailScanner:
Feb 7 17:18:45 MailScanner: RBL checks: m17M9lxS016045 found in
Feb 7 17:18:46 inbound42 MailScanner: SpamAssassin cache hit for
Feb 7 17:18:46 MailScanner: Message m17M9lxS016045 from 184.108.40.206(
ka at creativeholidays.com.au) to rmel.org is spam, SBL+XBL, SpamAssassin
(cached, score=23.378, required 5, autolearn=disabled,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 0.50, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100 1.50,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 1.50, RAZOR2_CHECK 0.50, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
2.19, RCVD_IN_XBL 2.90, STOX_REPLY_TYPE 0.00, TVD_FINGER_02 2.72,
URIBL_BLACK 1.96, URIBL_JP_SURBL 2.86, URIBL_OB_SURBL 2.13, URIBL_SC_SURBL
2.52, URIBL_WS_SURBL 2.10)
Notice that it still passes it through SpamAssassin.
I have the the following in my MailScanner.conf:
Spam List = SBL+XBL
Spam Lists To Be Spam = 1
Spam Lists To Reach High Score = 1
On 2/7/08, Richard Frovarp <richard.frovarp at sendit.nodak.edu> wrote:
> Vlad Mazek wrote:
> > So how does a message that gets hit by Spam Lists To Be Spam bypass
> > spamassassin checks in MailScanner?
> > -Vlad**
> *If spam and high scoring spam have the same actions, I think it will
> bypass. Or if you just set it to be high scoring spam, it will take that
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the MailScanner