"Is Definitely Spam" rule not working ?
pascal.maes at elec.ucl.ac.be
Wed Feb 6 19:53:21 GMT 2008
Le 05-févr.-08 à 19:32, Gerard a écrit :
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:18:07 +0100
> Pascal Maes <pascal.maes at elec.ucl.ac.be> wrote:
>> If yes, what's the use of smtpd_authorized_xforward_hosts (to be
>> posted on the postfix list also) ?
> Guess I am going to have to keep up with the Postfix forum to see how
> this turns out. Somehow I think it is going to be futile.
You exaggerate a little bit ;-)
Of course I get a remark but also the solution :
> Pascal Maes wrote:
>> The question is
>> Even with the option, smtpd_authorized_xforward_hosts, the first
>> "Received" is always the localhost.
>> That's a problem as we (MailScanner) can't use black or white
>> listing based on the IP address of the client.
>> A solution ?
> Use a header_checks rule with IGNORE to remove the offending line
> from the queue file.
> Note that MailScanner is known to not work reliably with postfix and
> is therefore not recommended or supported here.
The header_check is now :
/^Received: .* \[127\.0\.0\.1\]/ IGNORE
and it works.
More information about the MailScanner