Sanesecurity signatures are no longer being updated or
distributed
Ken A
ka at pacific.net
Mon Dec 15 15:04:52 GMT 2008
Achim J. Latz wrote:
> In case others are receiving errors from their update scripts [1]:
>
> "Sanesecurity signatures are no longer being updated or distributed due
> to extremely high server resource usage, which appears to be from a
> distributed denial of service attack (DDoS). I've moved server hosts
> twice (which takes time) and both times have resulted in the site being
> suspened.
>
> As many of you know, I produce the signatures and run the site, in my
> spare time and with Christmas approaching I’m finding my spare time is
> currently limited.
>
> Hopefully this won’t be the end of the signatures and I’m hoping that
> they may return in the New Year.
>
> May I take this opportunity to thank everyone who has helped this
> project, either by providing samples, bandwidth, download scripts or
> donating.
>
> Thanks and sorry to let you all down.
>
> Steve
> Sanesecurity"
>
> [1] http://www.sanesecurity.com/clamav/
That's too bad. I really saw a decent amount of crap detection.
Any other 3rd party sigs that are recommended?
I had tried msrbl sigs a while back and they produced a few fps, which
isn't really tolerable with clamav sigs. Perhaps they have improved the
process?
Ken
--
Ken Anderson
http://www.pacific.net/
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list