AW: AW: Not completely OT: Does this affect MailScanner users on RH/FC/CentOS?

[Ehle, Roland]

The test:

In the thread, ritz posted the following snippet.  Try it.  It should take under a second if the perl is not broken and a lot longer if it is.

#!/usr/bin/perl
use overload q(<) => sub {};
my %h;
for (my $i=0; $i<50000; $i++) {
$h{$i} = bless [ ] => 'main';
print STDERR '.' if $i % 1000 == 0;
}

The compile process failed with an error message, I am trying to fix it and will post the results on the wiki.

Regards,
Roland

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info [mailto:mailscanner-
> bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] Im Auftrag von Alex Neuman van der Hans
> Gesendet: Freitag, 29. August 2008 21:10
> An: MailScanner discussion
> Betreff: Re: AW: Not completely OT: Does this affect MailScanner users
> on RH/FC/CentOS?
>
> How much of an improvement? Can you describe both the test and the
> manual perl compile process and put it up on the wiki?
>
>
> On Aug 29, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Ehle, Roland wrote:
>
> > Just did the small test, which is mentioned on the page. Result: Yes
> > FC6 is affected. I will compile perl manually and put it into the
> > exclude list of yum.
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!