Not completely OT: Does this affect MailScanner users on RH/FC/CentOS?

[Alex Neuman van der Hans]

How much of an improvement do you believe we might see?

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 29, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Hugo van der Kooij <hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org 
 > wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alex Neuman van der Hans wrote:
>> http://blog.vipul.net/2008/08/24/redhat-perl-what-a-tragedy/
>>
>> This is something you perl-speaking geniuses will probably pick
>> through... What's your take, guys?
>
> The Centos team is looking at patching this rather soon.
>
> Hugo.
>
> - --
> hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
> PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
>
>    A: Yes.
>    >Q: Are you sure?
>    >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>    >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
>
> Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFIuCdqBvzDRVjxmYERAjDeAJ4xcpAJj6qiJloz4lwA0SJZ3dy4ugCeLCuQ
> E86JJxi2bKd8qqYQaRXVUNs=
> =+VTM
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> -- 
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!