Spam report addressed to multiple people
andrew at gdcon.net
Mon Aug 18 09:18:56 IST 2008
On Mon, August 18, 2008 6:26 am, Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
> Are you saying you send a notification for each spam message? Do you
> happen to send out some to senders as well? (If that is the case you
> will propably end up being blacklisted as spam amplifier.)
Sending notification on low-scoring spam to the recipient only - not to
the "sender" that would be stupid.
> But do you split messages before MailScanner? It sounds like you don't
> do that (properly).
OK - any pointers to the _correct_ way of doing this with PF?
> - --
> hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
> PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
> A: Yes.
> >Q: Are you sure?
> >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
> Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
> This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean.
> Click here to report this message as spam.
This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean.
More information about the MailScanner