ClamAV 0.93 released

[Rick Cooper]

You have to write your own processing via the genericspamscanner.pm module.
It's not inherent within mailscanner. Since I already use spamd with exim to
elimentate very high (18+) scoring spam at smtp time it makes sense not to
use mailscanner's spamassassin processing because it's a pretty huge chunk
of memory per child,  much faster loading and no loss of speed.

Rick 

 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info 
 > [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On 
 > Behalf Of Koopmann, Jan-Peter
 > Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 2:54 AM
 > To: MailScanner discussion
 > Subject: RE: ClamAV 0.93 released
 > 
 > Hi Rick,
 > 
 > how do you make MailScanner use spamd? This is either not 
 > possible or I
 > sadly missed this opportunity.
 > 
 > 
 > Kind regards,
 >   JP
 > 
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
 > [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Rick
 > Cooper
 > Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 3:20 AM
 > To: 'MailScanner discussion'
 > Subject: RE: ClamAV 0.93 released
 > 
 > If you really want to see mailscanner lose weight without 
 > losing speed
 > you
 > should see it when it's using spamd instead of the perl mod.IIRC it
 > drops to
 > 15mg or so per child, make that 21mg (just checked )  and is just as
 > fast,
 > and spamd shares the sigs with it's children, again IIRC. 
 > 
 > Rick
 > --
 > MailScanner mailing list
 > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
 > http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
 > 
 > Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
 > 
 > Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
 > 
 > --
 > This message has been scanned for viruses and
 > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
 > believed to be clean.
 > 
 > 


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.