Opinion on X-AntiAbuse: headers?
Hugo van der Kooij
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org
Wed Apr 16 22:13:25 IST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
This might be pushing the boundry of being on or off-topic.
But does anyone know when valid email actually contain X-AntiAbuse: headers?
So far (2 years now) I have only seen them in spam and never in legit
traffic. I think over 90% of the times it is a poorly managed website
with some broken email script.
Hugo.
- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
A: Yes.
>Q: Are you sure?
>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIBmvzBvzDRVjxmYERAhmkAJ0ddHfZ4E0cL/CScS9YxpKaq9AjpgCfbcq3
K6NLJektaMJEEtMMiRwsvWs=
=iVCF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list