Backscatter & challenge response

[Hugo van der Kooij]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Devon Harding wrote:
|
|     I agree totally. I bounce any mail from a known 'challenge response'
|     user. The entire concept of 'challenge response' is flawed and a huge
|     waste of time and bandwidth.
| What has everyone been doing to stop these?

I can just speak for myself. But I found the following line in header
checks took care of one of them:
#       No dirty autoresponders
/^X-ChoiceMail-Registration-Request/    REJECT  We are not buying into
your ChoiceMail crap

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIBDdCBvzDRVjxmYERArFRAJsE15i5UKyoZ+PADHb5CpMjFGr6vQCffPy5
2jrPg3jtkxluPCnNO4pxXWA=
=hRi/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----