4.68 / 4.69 SA cache working?

Scott Silva ssilva at sgvwater.com
Fri Apr 11 18:50:04 IST 2008


on 4-10-2008 2:16 AM Julian Field spake the following:
> Can someone running 4.68 or 4.69 please confirm that the SpamAssassin 
> cache is still working okay?
> Hopefully, the analyse_SpamAssassin_cache command will tell you.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Jules
> 
--------- TOTALS ---------
Total records:       160
First seen (oldest): 211654 sec
First seen (newest): 38 sec
Last seen (oldest):  211654 sec
Last seen (newest):  38 sec
Cache Hit Rate       0%
-------- NON-SPAM --------
Total records:       38
First seen (oldest): 1825 sec
First seen (newest): 38 sec
Last seen (oldest):  1825 sec
Last seen (newest):  38 sec
-------- LOW-SPAM --------
Total records:       0
First seen (oldest): 0 sec
First seen (newest): 0 sec
Last seen (oldest):  0 sec
Last seen (newest):  0 sec
------- HIGH-SPAM --------
Total records:       64
First seen (oldest): 10529 sec
First seen (newest): 44 sec
Last seen (oldest):  10529 sec
Last seen (newest):  44 sec
-------- VIRUSES  --------
Total records:       57
First seen (oldest): 159628 sec
First seen (newest): 4371 sec
Last seen (oldest):  159628 sec
Last seen (newest):  4371 sec
----- TOP 5 HASHES -------
MD5                                     COUNT   FIRST   LAST
closing dbh with active statement handles at 
/usr/sbin/analyse_SpamAssassin_cach                                  e line 65.


-- 
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20080411/aecc2ad2/signature.bin


More information about the MailScanner mailing list