New MS install is slow to an extreme
dave.list at pixelhammer.com
Thu Apr 3 17:35:20 IST 2008
> Julian Field wrote:
>> Max Unscanned Bytes Per Scan = 100m
>> Max Unsafe Bytes Per Scan = 50m
>> Max Unscanned Messages Per Scan = 30
>> Max Unsafe Messages Per Scan = 30
> I thought so, but my setting is unchanged from the default on the old
> and the new installs. Which is why I doubted my understanding of the
I've changed that setting to
Max Unscanned Messages Per Scan = 10
Max Unsafe Messages Per Scan = 10
this has reduced scan time a bit more. It seems more children scanning
small batches is faster than fewer children scanning large batches. I've
no idea if that is relevant to anyone else's mail but mine.
> At this point, 10:00am, we have survived the morning rush of email with
> no obvious issues and mail is flowing nicely. My largest number of
> waiting messages has been 120 (yesterday it was 2k at this time, 4k by
Julian, in the spam.assassin.prefs.conf file you include the rules for
URIBL_BLACK and URIBL_GREY. The rules for SpamAssassin 3.2.X includes
those rules now. http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_2_x.html
Might want to remove them or add a note that they do not need
uncommented unless you are running SpamAssassin 3.1.X or earlier.
I had them uncommented, shame on me for not checking the SA change log
better than I did.
In 50 years, our descendants will look back on the early years
of the internet, and much like we now look back on men with
rockets on their back and feathers glued to their arms, marvel
that we had the intelligence to wipe the drool from our chins.
More information about the MailScanner