MailScanner ANNOUNCE: 4.68.8 stable released

[Hugo van der Kooij]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Brian wrote:
| Julian Field wrote:
|> Folks,
|>
|> I have just released the latest stable release of MailScanner version
|> 4.68.8.
|> This is *not* an April Fool's joke :-)
|>
|>
|
| Am I seeing double or is this an error?

It is an error. But not by Jules as far as I can tell. Someone at
whi.wts.edu sure did not finish school and is resending the message.

I am sure Jules will take care of them.

Return-Path: <mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info>
X-Original-To: hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org
Delivered-To: hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org
Received: from safir.blacknight.ie (safir.blacknight.ie [83.98.192.7])
	by balin.waakhond.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCED817E806C
	for <hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org>; Wed,  2 Apr 2008 16:25:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from safir.blacknight.ie (safir.blacknight.ie [127.0.0.1])
	by safir.blacknight.ie (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m32EMqV8024842;
	Wed, 2 Apr 2008 15:23:12 +0100
X-Mailman-Handler: $Id: mm-handler,v 1.2 2002/04/05 19:41:09 bwarsaw Exp $
Received: from whi.wts.edu (whi.wts.edu [68.166.48.243])
	by safir.blacknight.ie (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m32E65Ee023617;
	Wed, 2 Apr 2008 15:06:38 +0100
Received: from root by whi.wts.edu with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <root at whi.wts.edu>)
	id 1Jh3X5-0000QO-18; Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:01:43 -0400
Received: from safir.blacknight.ie ([83.98.192.7])
	by whi.wts.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.68)
	(envelope-from <mailscanner-announce-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info>)
	id 1JghpF-0003Mh-14
	for klowery at whi.wts.edu; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:51:01 -0400
Received: from safir.blacknight.ie (safir.blacknight.ie [127.0.0.1])
	by safir.blacknight.ie (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m31Elj04015650;
	Tue, 1 Apr 2008 15:49:39 +0100
X-Mailman-Handler: $Id: mm-handler,v 1.2 2002/04/05 19:41:09 bwarsaw Exp $
Received: from owl.ecs.soton.ac.uk (owl.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.68.129])
	by safir.blacknight.ie (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m31EVjkl014479;
	Tue, 1 Apr 2008 15:32:17 +0100
X-ECS-MailScanner-Watermark: 1207665102.39997 at y1R0Rm1iFbQE2n4lgk2mxw
Received: from goose.ecs.soton.ac.uk (goose.ecs.soton.ac.uk
	[IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102:230:48ff:fe78:67b5])
	by owl.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m31EVdjI031637;
	Tue, 1 Apr 2008 15:31:39 +0100
X-ECS-MailScanner-Watermark: 1207665094.58777 at eXwqjdynfwPiouKMG6IgfA
Received: from apothecary.ecs.soton.ac.uk (apothecary.ecs.soton.ac.uk
	[152.78.64.25]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by goose.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m31EVXqI027345;
	Tue, 1 Apr 2008 15:31:33 +0100
Message-ID: <47F24745.2090703 at ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:31:33 +0100
From: Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Organization: MailScanner
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213)
MIME-Version: 1.0
....

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH9Gj+BvzDRVjxmYERAiLqAJ0WYnJWdHF1+Fvi2+KbapcLoeDcigCfYitq
n4TwWVncyVZ1lPeVDDHw5Q4=
=100Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----