format error: can't find EOCD signature

[Rick Cooper]

 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info 
 > [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On 
 > Behalf Of Julian Field
 > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 3:52 PM
 > To: MailScanner discussion
 > Subject: Re: format error: can't find EOCD signature
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > Rick Cooper wrote:
 > >  
 > >
 > >  > -----Original Message-----
 > >  > From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info 
 > >  > [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On 
 > >  > Behalf Of Scott Silva
 > >  > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 2:04 PM
 > >  > To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
 > >  > Subject: Re: format error: can't find EOCD signature
 > >  > 
 > >  > Simon Jones spake the following on 9/14/2007 6:02 AM:
 > >  > > Hi, ok been playing with the debug tool :)
 > >  > > 
 > >  > > What can cause the following when running mailscanner --debug
 > >  > > --debug-sa?
 > >  > > 
 > >  > > [20434] dbg: learn: auto-learn? ham=0.1, spam=12, 
 > body-points=3.88,
 > >  > > head-points=3.88, learned-points=0
 > >  > > [20434] dbg: learn: auto-learn? no: inside auto-learn 
 > >  > thresholds, not
 > >  > > considered ham or spam
 > >  > 
 > >  > No one commented on this error. It just means that the 
 > >  > message was outside the 
 > >  > auto-learn thresholds.
 > >  > 
 > > [...]
 > >
 > >
 > > Actually I commented, and also posted a one line code 
 > snippet for Julian
 > > that would keep that error from every being seen in the 
 > first place. I just
 > > assumed he wasn't interested
 > >   
 > He was interested, he just forgot to reply to the posting 
 > after he added 
 > the line to the source code (and credited the author with 
 > his patch in 
 > the Change Log).
[...]

Oh I'm not the author, I remember seeing that or something similar a long
time ago in a function for some program or another that used that perl
module. If I could recall I would tell you where but it's not my original
thought for certain. I just remember they used an empty function to replace
the default handler as they also dumped anything that didn't evaluate to
AZ_OK (undef would be same/same). But thanks!

Rick


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.