High scoring spam rules file

[Anthony Peacock]

Hi,

mailinglist wrote:
> Shouldn't be a typo there I still can't see it if there is.

Did you cut&paste the example configuration lines or retype them?

If you cut&pasted them, then you are missing two colons (:) after the "To"s.


> 
> Yes I restarted Mailscanner after this but no joy.
> 
> Dee
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of
> Martin.Hepworth
> Sent: 17 September 2007 14:35
> To: MailScanner discussion
> Subject: RE: High scoring spam rules file
> 
> Assumee there's a deliberate typo there..
> 
> To:   somedomain.com	delete
> To:   other.domain.com	delete
> FromOrTo:   default  deliver header "X-Spam-Status: Yes"
> 
> And you restarted mailscanner after this change?
> 
> --
> Martin Hepworth
> Snr Systems Administrator
> Solid State Logic
> Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info [mailto:mailscanner-
>> bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of mailinglist
>> Sent: 17 September 2007 14:28
>> To: MailScanner discussion
>> Subject: High scoring spam rules file
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>>             I tried to do different things with high scoring spam
>> depending on the domain it's sent to and have done the following.
>>
>>
>>
>> Created file called high.spam.rules in the mailscanner etc rules folder
>>
>>
>>
>> # Default Rules for high scoring spam.
>>
>> To                    somedomain.com         delete
>>
>> To                    other.domain.com         delete
>>
>> FromOrTo:       default                          deliver header "X-Spam-
>> Status: Yes"
>>
>>
>>
>> Then edited Mailscanner.conf
>>
>>
>>
>> High Scoring Spam Actions = /opt/Mailscanner/etc/rules/high.spam.rules
>>
>>
>>
>> But it isn't deleting the high scoring junk any ideas?
>>
>>
>>
>> Dee
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **********************************************************************
> Confidentiality : This e-mail and any attachments are intended for the 
> addressee only and may be confidential. If they come to you in error 
> you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them 
> to anyone. Please advise the sender by replying to this e-mail 
> immediately and then delete the original from your computer.
> Opinion : Any opinions expressed in this e-mail are entirely those of 
> the author and unless specifically stated to the contrary, are not 
> necessarily those of the author's employer.
> Security Warning : Internet e-mail is not necessarily a secure 
> communications medium and can be subject to data corruption. We advise 
> that you consider this fact when e-mailing us. 
> Viruses : We have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and any 
> attachments are free from known viruses but in keeping with good 
> computing practice, you should ensure that they are virus free.
> 
> Red Lion 49 Ltd T/A Solid State Logic
> Registered as a limited company in England and Wales 
> (Company No:5362730)
> Registered Office: 25 Spring Hill Road, Begbroke, Oxford OX5 1RU, 
> United Kingdom
> **********************************************************************
> 


-- 
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:    http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"A CAT scan should take less time than a PET scan.  For a CAT scan,
  they're only looking for one thing, whereas a PET scan could result in
  a lot of things."    - Carl Princi, 2002/07/19