Trouble with White Listing Mailman list

[Dave Filchak]

shuttlebox wrote:
> On 9/5/07, Dave Filchak <dfilchak at sympatico.ca> wrote:
>   
>> X-zuka.net-rw-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
>>         score=5.13, required 5, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44,
>>         FUZZY_OCR_CORRUPT_IMG 0.50, HEADER_SPAM 3.12, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00,
>>         HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY 0.13, SARE_GIF_ATTACH 1.42,
>>         SARE_HEAD_HDR_APPROV 0.82, SARE_UNI 0.59), not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
>>         score=3.451, required 5, FUZZY_OCR_CORRUPT_IMG 0.50,
>>         HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY 0.13, INFO_TLD 0.81,
>>         SARE_GIF_ATTACH 1.42, SARE_UNI 0.59)
>>     
>
>   
>> X-Zuka-EB-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=8.226,
>>         required 5, BAYES_50 0.00, HEADER_SPAM 3.40,
>>         HTML_MESSAGE 0.00,
>>         INLINE_IMAGE 2.00, SARE_GIF_ATTACH 1.42, SARE_HEAD_HDR_APPROV 0.82,
>>         SARE_UNI 0.59), not spam, SpamAssassin (cached, score=4.013,
>>         required 5, BAYES_50 0.00, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, INLINE_IMAGE 2.00,
>>         SARE_GIF_ATTACH 1.42, SARE_UNI 0.59)
>>     
>
> Very strange that you in the report have two reports, one that says
> it's spam and one that disagrees! Do you have spamd running?
>
> Also, remove the dot in zuka.net (%org-name%), it's not allowed. It's
> been known to cause problems.
>
> Julian: would you consider adding a dot/underscore check to --lint?
>
>   
No ... we are not running spamd. To my knowledge, MailScanner is using 
spamassassin directly.

Dave