Mailscanner seg fault

Glenn Steen glenn.steen at gmail.com
Wed Oct 31 00:51:41 GMT 2007


On 31/10/2007, Jeff Mills <Jeff.Mills at versacold.com.au> wrote:
> I just noticed that one of my mailscanner processes keeps segfaulting.
> I have done a debug, but I cannot find anything valuable.
> It appears to fault after auto-learn.
>
> Anyone know where I can look next to work this out?
>
>
> [7219] dbg: check:
> tests=BOTNET,BOTNET_CLIENT,BOTNET_IPINHOSTNAME,RDNS_DYNAMIC
> [7219] dbg: check:
> subtests=__CT,__CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY,__DOS_BODY_WED,__DOS_HAS_ANY_URI,__DO
> S_RCVD_WED,__DOS_REF_TODAY,__DOS_RELAYED_EXT,__FB_S_PRICE,__FM_MY_PRICE,
> __HAS_ANY_EMAIL,__HAS_ANY_URI,__HAS_MSGID,__HAS_RCVD,__HAS_SUBJECT,__HAS
> _X_MAILER,__HS_SUBJ_UC_FW,__LAST_UNTRUSTED_RELAY_NO_AUTH,__MIME_ATTACHME
> NT,__MIME_QP,__MIME_VERSION,__MISSING_REF,__MSGID_OK_HEX,__MSGID_OK_HOST
> ,__NONEMPTY_BODY,__PART_STOCK_CD_F,__RDNS_DYNAMIC_IPADDR,__SANE_MSGID,__
> SARE_BODY_BLANKS_5_100,__SARE_BODY_BLNK_5_100,__SARE_HEAD_MIME_VALID,__S
> ARE_HTML_URR_MAILTO,__SARE_META_MURTY3,__SARE_SUB_OBFU_USCORE,__SARE_URI
> _ANY,__SARE_WHITELIST_FLAG,__TOCC_EXISTS,__TVD_BODY,__TVD_MIME_ATT_TP,__
> TVD_MIME_CT_MM,__XM_MS_IN_GENERAL
> [7219] dbg: learn: auto-learn? ham=0.1, spam=12, body-points=3.12,
> head-points=3.12, learned-points=0
> [7219] dbg: learn: auto-learn? no: inside auto-learn thresholds, not
> considered ham or spam
> Segmentation fault
>
Check the validity of your bayes db, perhaps start by dumping magic...
As with all sigsegv  errors... could be anything... even RAM gone
bad.... but if it is consistent, check the obvious culprits first.

Cheers
-- 
-- Glenn
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se


More information about the MailScanner mailing list