Bug evaluating rulesets with the MailScanner command?

Glenn Steen glenn.steen at gmail.com
Thu Oct 18 12:36:02 IST 2007


On 18/10/2007, Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Glenn Steen wrote:
> > On 18/10/2007, Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Glenn Steen wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 17/10/2007, Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> >>>>
> >>>> I've just fixed this problem, it will be in the next release.
> >>>>
> >>> Thanks! Might one ask what all that was about?
> >>>
> >> Er, no :-)
> >>
> > Sounds like it was ... embarrassing:-)
> > ... must find the time to look at that then...:-):-)
> >
> No, not at all. It's just very techy, and not easy to explain.
>
> Jules
>
Ah. Glad you explained that to .... this un-techy-like-feeling type:-):-)

BTW, did you ever get the camera book from amazon? I don't seem to
have gotten any receipt from them...

Cheers
-- 
-- Glenn
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se


More information about the MailScanner mailing list