Bug evaluating rulesets with the MailScanner command?

Glenn Steen glenn.steen at gmail.com
Thu Oct 18 12:08:45 IST 2007


On 18/10/2007, Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Glenn Steen wrote:
> > On 17/10/2007, Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> I've just fixed this problem, it will be in the next release.
> >
> > Thanks! Might one ask what all that was about?
> Er, no :-)
Sounds like it was ... embarrassing:-)
... must find the time to look at that then...:-):-)

> > Or will it be obvious when one sees the code?:-)
> Possibly, but I wouldn't guarantee it... :-)
Commenting on my code-reading skills, eh?;-)

> >
> >> Glenn Steen wrote:
> >>> On 16/10/2007, Randal, Phil <prandal at herefordshire.gov.uk>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> #MailScanner --value=virusscanning --from=glenn.steen at ap1.se
> >>>> --to=glenn.steen at ap1.se --ip=172.16.0.1 Can't call method
> >>>> "DFileName" on an undefined value at
> >>>> /usr/lib/MailScanner/MailScanner/SMDiskStore.pm line 90.
> >>>>
> >>>> # MailScanner --lint Checking version numbers... Version
> >>>> number in MailScanner.conf (4.64.3) is correct.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yup, it's still broken.
> >>>>
> >>>> I mentioned this on the list not that long ago, to zero
> >>>> response.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>> Phil
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Thanks Phil, for the confirmation, and sorry for missing your
> >>> earlier report.
> >>>
> >>> Jules, could you please have a look? This is (IMO) a nifty
> >>> thing, when debugging rulesets...
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>>
> >> Jules
> >>
> >
> > Cheers
>
> Jules
>

Cheers
-- 
-- Glenn
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se


More information about the MailScanner mailing list