Redundant Mail System Suggestions

Richard Frovarp richard.frovarp at sendit.nodak.edu
Tue Nov 27 18:40:05 GMT 2007


UxBoD wrote:
> Hey Johnny,
>
> Personal I would go with the primary and secondary MX record solution.  Multiple A records are find but IMHO are more used for load balancing than redundancy.

Or if the links and machines are equal, go with equal MX records. Some 
broken mailers won't fail down the MX chain.


More information about the MailScanner mailing list