OT: Load Balancing & redundancy using Multiple A records
Hugo van der Kooij
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org
Sat Nov 24 09:27:10 GMT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> On Nov 23, 2007 5:27 PM, Richard Frovarp
> <Richard.Frovarp at sendit.nodak.edu> wrote:
>> Yeah, but will the sending SMTPs fail through the multiple A records for
>> a single MX?
> That sounds uncertain at best. :-) I use one MX for each server and
> that always works.
In my experience that is the most shock proof solution.
But keep in mind that whenever you make something foolproof the will be
a new model of fool(1) on the market soon. Thanks to windows we now also
have loads of fool(8) processes. ;-)
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
>Q: Are you sure?
>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the MailScanner