OT: Load Balancing & redundancy using Multiple A records
MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Fri Nov 23 15:59:07 GMT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> On Nov 23, 2007 12:13 PM, Steve Freegard <steve.freegard at fsl.com> wrote:
>> It works, but don't expect it to load balance well. For that you really
>> do need a proper load-balancer that can examine metrics of each of the
>> back-end systems and direct connections to them accordingly.
> I use this method both on the public (many-to-few) and the private
> side (few-to-few) of the network and it works real well. Over a months
> worth of traffic I see a difference of only 1-2%.
Join the club. I use round-robin DNS between a bunch of A records in my
single MX record, and it load balances it long-term rather nicely. The
web page you referred to talks all about the rules and regs but doesn't
really take account of what is actually implemented. Yes, the rules say
that DNS imposes no order in the results of a lookup. But in practice
the implementers tend to just read in an array and use it in order. So
it does help in my experience, whatever the rulebook says.
Just my 2p worth.
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
MailScanner customisation, or any advanced system administration help?
Contact me at Jules at Jules.FM
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.7.0 (Build 867)
Comment: Use Thunderbird's Enigmail Add-on to verify this message
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the MailScanner