slightly OT: 550 5.1.1 / att.net

[Hugo van der Kooij]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andy Norris wrote:
> 
> At 23:02 2007-11-19, Andy Norris wrote:
> 
>> I Googled and searched the archives, but didn't find anything that
>> really helped the situation.
>> I have two addresses in the past couple days that have given me fits.
>> Both are att.net (and one belongs to the mother-in-law -- so it has to
>> be fixed for peace to reign).
>> Both result in immediate "550 5.1.1 - User unknown in virtual mailbox
>> table".
>> Is this something I can fix, or do I have to butt heads with someone
>> at att.net support?
>> We're running sendmail on redhat, btw.

> Ok, I think this is a postfix issue. A setting somewhere in
> /etc/postfix/main.cf? I'm paranoid of breaking something that already is
> working.
> 
> Odd that it's seemingly only to att.net addresses... no problems -- that
> I know of to any other domains...?

Well. A bit more detail would not hurt. At this moment it is even
unclear which MTA you are using. You started with sendmail but did throw
in postfix as well to obscure about the only thing that might have been
clear.

I think it would help if you show relevant log lines, config sections, ....

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHQn2gBvzDRVjxmYERArr4AKCdrkQsMRg5WHxtoB9WrS/E2Jrr3gCeKuGB
oQkcyzmsCiFw2I9S6Po5iO8=
=EPX5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----