scanning rules

eclipsem at optusnet.com.au eclipsem at optusnet.com.au
Thu Nov 15 11:40:20 GMT 2007





> Hugo van der Kooij <hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org> wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> eclipsem at optusnet.com.au wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> Hugo van der Kooij <hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> eclipsem at optusnet.com.au wrote:
> >>
> >>> Nov 15 08:44:37 exorcist sendmail[3538]: lAEMiaYp003538: 
> >> from=<X at optusnet.com.au>, size=443, class=0, nrcpts=1, 
> >> msgid=<4.64.0711150843470.22685 at blacksabeth>, proto=ESMTP, 
> daemon=MTA, 
> >> relay=[10.0.1.19] [10.0.1.19]
> >>> Nov 15 08:44:38 exorcist MailScanner[3524]: New Batch: Scanning 1 
> >> messages, 892 bytes
> >>> Nov 15 08:44:39 exorcist MailScanner[3524]: Spam Checks: Starting
> >>> Nov 15 08:44:39 exorcist sendmail[3544]: lAEMiaYp003538: 
> >> to=X at optusnet.com.au, ctladdr=<X at optusnet.com.au> (1009/100), 
> >> delay=00:00:02, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=120443, 
> >> relay=[10.0.1.19] [10.0.1.19], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (lAEMicrY022692 
> >> Message accepted for delivery)
> >>> Nov 15 08:44:39 exorcist MailScanner[3524]: Unscanned: Delivered 1 
> >> messages
> >>> Nov 15 08:44:39 exorcist MailScanner[3524]: Virus and Content 
> >> Scanning: Starting
> >>
> >> It explicitly tells you it did NOT scan. (See the Unscanned: line)
> >>
> > 
> > Then what is the point of all the starting spam checks and starting 
> virus scanning log entries,
> > thats fine here on local messages, but does not answer the main issue 
> we have on our script generated messages where it does in fact add the 
> headers to the email and clearly ignores the whitelists
> > 
> > Are you the programmer of mailscanner? if not how about you leave this 
> for him or her to answer
> > 
> > I have until COB today, or I have been told to reinstall MIMEDefang 
> before I go home, guess it's time to start installing it now so I can 
> enact it at 430
> 
> I suggest you pay Jules for commercial support if it is that important
> to you.

ROFLMFAO, pay the author to fix his code? sounds like you work at microsoft.

> 
> If you do not value peer advise then why bother with a mailinglist to
> begin with?
> 

because this is the only way to log a bug report that gets a repsonse


> Hugo.
> 
> 
> - --
> hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
> PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
> 
> 	A: Yes.
> 	>Q: Are you sure?
> 	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> 	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
> 
> Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFHO+hgBvzDRVjxmYERAonrAJ0WUVSW4aGS4fSNUIxvNPMtxHDXOgCfXVST
> yUQ/eO5lMV9DCPlo08jZZmM=
> =d8bN
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> -- 
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
> 
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
> 
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!


More information about the MailScanner mailing list