Postfix vs MailScanner : Slow Incoming Queue
glenn.steen at gmail.com
Sat Nov 10 10:45:33 GMT 2007
On 09/11/2007, Gerard Seibert <gerard at seibercom.net> wrote:
> On Friday November 09, 2007 at 03:58:46 (AM) Glenn Steen wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > Ah. Great that you found it (all MTA, and OT, but still.... One could
> > well think the ones over at the PF list would've been able to see
> > this:-):-)... Anyway... I do think that evere other second is a bit
> > often, you could try every 10 or 15 seconds or similar... Would mean
> > approximately 25 deliveries in every chunk. But if the system doesn't
> > suffer too much from the queue scans... well, every other second it
> > is:-).
> OK, I don't want to start a war here; however, I saw "R Wahyudi
> <rwahyudi at gmail.com>" original post on the Postfix forum. I did not see a
> copy of his 'postconf -n' output. Without that information it would have been
> virtually impossible for anyone to have accurately diagnosed his problem.
As you know Gerard, I'm not the contentious type;-). No wars in sight...
You are quite right, Rianto could have been as detailed as he (or is
that a female name?) eventually was here, but that is not my point...
All I say is that they could have asked for relevant information (not
just the "use of MailScanner disqualifies you from ever getting our
As you did here.
I don't think there is any argument here, is there?
> IMHO, he would be well served to post that information, as well as detailed
> information regarding his network on the Postfix forum so that his problem
> could be properly analysed. Altering the default settings as much as he
> apparently has done does not seem correct.
Yes,I think it a bit ... extreme... too. But with the figures of
incoming mail s/he cites, if the qmgr really only wakeup every five
minutes... that *will* land him/her with a seemingly slow delivery,
there is no argumenting with that. On the other hand, I'm sure one
could try affect the operation of the qmgr other ways that might get
the same effect, or even some MailScanner setting.
I'm very busy/tired ATM, so haven't spent even close to enough time
looking at this problem ... Perhaps shouldn't be posting on the list
at all... Sigh - Where did things like "free time" and "relaxation"
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se
More information about the MailScanner