Postfix vs MailScanner : Slow Incoming Queue

Julian Field MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Sat Nov 10 00:50:24 GMT 2007


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Drew Marshall wrote:
> On 9 Nov 2007, at 22:50, R Wahyudi wrote:
>
>> I did  ..   
>> http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2007-11/0364.html
>>
>> Anyway .. I am still curious to know if this is the default 
>> MailScanner - postfix behavior ie : you have to wait for
>> qmgr to respawn to be able to deliver message from incoming queue ??
>
> Evening all, been far too long since I have posted (Been stupidly busy 
> :-( )
Glad to see you back!
>
> I would suggest you want to check your Delivery method option at the 
> bottom MailScanner.conf and make sure it is batch and not queue. 
> Setting it to queue would invoke this behaviour. Changing the queue 
> runner settings should not be required. The queue running is called by 
> Postfix when each process finishes to advise the next to run. The 300 
> second delay is merely to catch anything that 'got left behind'.
Good catch, I had completely forgotten that might be what's happening.

Jules

- -- 
Julian Field MEng CITP
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

MailScanner customisation, or any advanced system administration help?
Contact me at Jules at Jules.FM

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.7.0 (Build 867)
Comment: Use Thunderbird's Enigmail add-on to verify this message
Charset: ISO-8859-1

wj8DBQFHNQBSEfZZRxQVtlQRAl71AKCgkUd1cimwQGieRwWBeLlBdxH9CACgkBup
QCqGhUZUB0OHf3GV7w7rVsk=
=oQF/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk



More information about the MailScanner mailing list