feature request: compress attachments

[Julian Field]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Glenn Steen wrote:
> Talking about betas, do you plan on putting one out with some form of
> "p record handling" for Postfix any time soon? I've been really bogged
> down lately, so haven't worked on the "PF2.4 version" ... yet:).
> If you need a new set of "PF2.3" patches, I think I can find them in
> the archives for you... Or wherever I put them:-). If you want to look
> at what I have for 2.4/full body edits, I'll liekly need do a new
> set... Provided I did get around to doing the ugly "spin through
> security check" in ReadQf... RALM striking again (I think you are
> familiar with the consept... Random Access Lossy Memory:), mostly
> since I've been very busy with other stuff.
How do I make PF generate these "p records"?
As they can only be generated locally, they shouldn't contain malicious 
content so I probably don't need to merge them into the main text, I 
just need to handle them and be able to put them back in at the end. 
Does that sound likely?
What can p records actually do?

I would be very interested in a set of PF2.3 patches.
What is the difference between 2.3 and 2.4?

Jules

- -- 
Julian Field MEng CITP
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

MailScanner customisation, or any advanced system administration help?
Contact me at Jules at Jules.FM

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.1 (Build 1012)
Charset: ISO-8859-1

wj8DBQFGVFMQEfZZRxQVtlQRAs1/AJ4kwqlJdl+bWb9jbtAEp1Hh8I96TgCg2Jag
gx+wcjnL92/GIXoPidhVxJ0=
=ffmX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk