Clamav suggestions

[Richard Frovarp]

Fabio Pedretti wrote:
>
> 3) Support for clamd trough clamdscan is nice, however, best would be 
> to connect to clamd directly to its socket (or network socket) from 
> MailScanner, without call clamdscan, and fallback to clamscan if clamd 
> is not working. 

Why not just run clamavmodule? From my understanding, the support for 
clamd was added so that those that didn't want to keep up with the Perl 
module required for clamavmodule would have something faster than 
clamscan. Any direct call to clamd from MailScanner would require a Perl 
module, so at that point you're losing the requirements benefit of 
running clamd.