Spamassassin and ClamAV - Where From?

Alex Neuman van der Hans alex at
Tue Mar 27 22:20:18 CEST 2007

Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Steve Freegard wrote:
> So using an up-to-date repository is propably even better as it will 
> keep ClamAV up-to-date where this install method does not. (It is just 
> up-to-date at the point you install the other bits.
> I run Centos 4.4 and use selective repositories and did not install 
> anything from the installer. I rebuild mailscanner and took the 
> remainder of the packages from the repositories.
> Hugo.
That's almost always true, but clamav-0.90 did have *some* problems 
breaking stuff - and people using nightly yum updates and such had to 
deal with that. True, it's only happened once that I know of, but it's 
important to know the pros and cons.

More information about the MailScanner mailing list