IP address reputation, BorderWare

[Res]

On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Chris Yuzik wrote:

> Res wrote:
>> 
>> It's simple, if anyone is so concerned about a few extra bytes of traffic 
>> in SV, you can solve all of your paranoia simply like this
>> 
>> telnet core
>> conf t
>> access-list 191 deny tcp any any eq 25
>> 
>> int FastEthernet0
>> ip access-group 191 in
>> 
>> 
> Res,
>
> Somebody's gonna type that in! Hopefully they won't. But somebody might! Oy!

Chris, thats the solution if they dont like the extra half a dozen TCP 
pkts :)

Seriously, they need to get over it, like I said more traffic generation 
is caused by greylisting, yet 90% of this list try say we should all use 
it, there is just no difference really, its extra non-common smtp traffic
generation, the same as SV.
Personally I don'y use either, and for time being never will, however if I 
do, I'd more likely use SV then greylisting.

-- 
Cheers
Res


Let Novell known what you think of their back door deal with the devil.
Sign the petition today:   http://techp.org/p/1/