Skipping users

[Jay Chandler]

Thomas A. Cameron wrote:
> I'm not completely sure what the terminology is for what I'm trying to do or what layer would be best to do it on, so I'm mailing the list.
>
> I'll start out by saying I'm extremely pleased with MailScanner. The entire suite works extremely well, and  in the short time I've been using it I have already seen better results than from any other package I have ever experienced with other packages.
>
> Having said all of that, I have a user that believes he doesn't need SPAM protection. He believes he can handle the problem better than any tool. If I had a way to do it, I wouldn't block connections with an RBL either, just to show him what he's in for. But, that's not something I really want to get into.
>
> My question is this. How can I tell MailScanner to blindly accept any email destined for several addresses? Would I be better off doing this on the postfix level with a header check that tests positive on every address except his few? I use the SQL whitelist function of MailWatch, so I can't whitelist wildcards for his address. Is it possible to chain rule files & modules for the "is definitely not spam" option?
>
> Any suggestions would REALLY be appreciated. This is such a backward idea, I'm not even sure what I would call it. 
>
> --
> Thomas Cameron
> Phone: 1.603.669.8551
> tomc at bostonpost.com
>
>
>   
I do this right now for abuse@ here.

Simple enough to set up, just put it in spam.whitelist.rules.

I'd also do it within your MTA because I'm twisted like that...

--Jay