message is spam because it was sent from mailscanner...
Furnish, Trever G
TGFurnish at herffjones.com
Mon Mar 5 17:44:38 CET 2007
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf
> Of Matt Kettler
> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 6:01 PM
> To: MailScanner discussion
> Subject: Re: message is spam because it was sent from mailscanner...
>
>
> Matt Kettler wrote:
> > Perhaps you should update your SA rules.
> >
> > The current set of rules from sa-update has had INFO_TLD removed..
> >
>
> For further reference, this appears to have happened
> somewhere between update
> 487253 published 12/15/2006, and 488380, published 12/19/2006.
>
> Note that even though SpamAssassin 3.1.8 was published after
> this change, it still contains more-or-less the original
> 3.1.0 ruleset, with only the more serious bugfixes in it.
Hmmm. Thanks for the info. My last rules update was just the rules,
updated using sa-update, on February 13th. That was also my *first* use
of sa-update -- had been doing full SA rip-out-and-replace upgrades
before then -- so I perhaps I missed something. :-(
Here are my versions:
[root at relay2 sysadm]# spamassassin --version
SpamAssassin version 3.1.3
running on Perl version 5.8.0
[root at relay2 sysadm]# sa-update --version
sa-update version svn408695
running on Perl version 5.8.0
I'll run another sa-update and then go looking for INFO_TLD. I needed
to get in and find X_IP today regardless -- had a few ham hitting that
and I'm not finding much info on why the presence of an X-IP header
merits such a high score contribution.
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list