Beta release 4.61.4

[DAve]

Julian Field wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> 
> DAve wrote:
>> Daniel Maher wrote:
>>>> 4 Added new feature (thanks to Matt Hampton for this) to skip the spam
>>>> checks
>>>>   on a message if it is a reply to one of your own messages. This is
>>>> known as
>>>>   "watermarking" a message. There are 4 new configuration settings:
>>>>   Add Watermark = yes
>>>>   Skip Spam Checks If Watermark Valid = yes
>>>>   Watermark Secret = SOMETHING-SECRET!
>>>>   Watermark Lifetime = 2419200 # = 4 weeks
>>> Does this result in the addition of a header or something?  Is there 
>>> detailed technical documentation available for this new feature?
>>>
>> The big question is the LifeTime. Is MailScanner caching the 
>> watermark? IF so can that cache be shared? We have multiple incoming 
>> MS servers, and multiple outgoing SMTP servers.
> It doesn't need to cache anything. The timestamp of the watermark is 
> embedded in itself.
>> If possible I am sure we can Ruby something up to add the watermark on 
>> the outbound servers and pass that information to the MXs.
> I just use MailScanner to add the watermark. Always worth checking your 
> outbound mail for viruses anyway, saves any potential legal problems 
> should you send a virus to someone.

We do check our outbound mail for spam and virus, and rate, and max 
rcpts, so on and so on. But we do not use MS on those servers.

DAve

> 
> Jules
> 
> - -- 
> Julian Field MEng CITP
> www.MailScanner.info
> Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
> 
> MailScanner customisation, or any advanced system administration help?
> Contact me at Jules at Jules.FM
> 
> PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
> For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk
> 
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.2 (Build 2014)
> Charset: ISO-8859-1
> 
> wj8DBQFGgVtoEfZZRxQVtlQRAqePAKCZD1gRQDij0h6jU8BPB5Iq+nNgZQCg+D1y
> TX6hQQm7rXIU2fn0awyb2ik=
> =x2kz
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 


-- 
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos
for other non-international holidays, but nothing for
Veterans?

Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible.