High ClamScan ...

[Alexandros Fragkiadakis]

On Mon, June 11, 2007 10:39 pm, Rob Poe wrote:
>> From Top
>>
>
> 30174 clam      25   0 26352  25M  1100 R    25.9  1.0   0:07   0
> clamscan 30142 clam      25   0 27044  26M  1100 R    25.5  1.0   0:19   0
> clamscan 30387 clam      25   0 13936  13M  1096 R    21.1  0.5   0:01   0
> clamscan 30128 clam      25   0 27488  26M  1100 R    19.9  1.0   0:30   0
> clamscan
>
> load average: 6.86, 4.74, 3.31
>
> Centos 3.x, Dual Xeon 2.8 /w 2.5 gigs of ram/HP Proliand DL380G3 /w
> hardware RAID 1 (SCSI 10k drives)
>
> What gives?
>
>
> Is there a better way to do this?  Seems that clamscan is tooo freaking
> slow any more..
>
> Another box:
> 16842 clam      25   0 18260  13m 1204 R   99  0.6   0:29.65 clamscan
> 17024 clam      25   0 12100 6696 1204 R   92  0.3   0:06.72 clamscan
> 16884 clam      25   0 19416  12m 1204 R   72  0.6   0:23.79 clamscan
> 17050 clam      25   0  6808 2276 1044 R   54  0.1   0:01.95 clamscan
> load average: 5.01, 3.86, 3.43 Centos 4.x, dual 2.8 xeon, 2g ram, dual SATA
> on a 3Ware controller
>
> These aren't slow boxes ..  but Clam is killing them..
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
>
You can use clamdscan.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.