OT: Spam King Arrested!
Ed
edwardbruce at sbcglobal.net
Sat Jun 2 17:53:45 IST 2007
Chris Mason (Lists) wrote:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>> One down --- thousands to go!
>>
> I wonder about that. If a change of policy and tolerance in the US
> towards these lowlifes meant that they started to get locked up, if
> spam was to be treated like DVD piracy and the US Gov sent delegations
> to other countries and demanded action, would the volume drop
> significantly? In most cases it is relatively easy to "follow the
> money" and fine those who benefit. The exception to those is the stock
> spams which try to influence the market, but again, probably easy
> enough to see the patterns and find out who is gaining from the scams.
>
> If the US Gov. gave a damn about spam, I think we would see a dramatic
> reduction in volume and the hard core spammers looking for other work.
>
But the only people that really care are the users, us. The backbone
providers love it cause they need to provide more fiber to carry all
that spam.
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list