Grreting card scams
Glenn Steen
glenn.steen at gmail.com
Thu Jul 26 23:42:44 IST 2007
On 27/07/07, Matt Kettler <mkettler at evi-inc.com> wrote:
> Rick Cooper wrote:
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
> > > [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On
> > > Behalf Of Matt Kettler
> > >
> > > However, If I copy one of the messages back onto the server
> > > and scan it with
> > > clamscan, clamscan does detect it as a virus.
> > >
> > > However, none of them have ever been detected as a virus
> > > while going through
> > > MailScanner. Ever. (I just searched all my postmaster
> > > notices from MailScanner
> > > and the word "You've" doesn't appear in any of them, which
> > > would be part of the
> > > subject-line quite.).
> > >
> > > Note that my MailScanner setup does detect phishing signatures.
> > >
> > > ie:
> > > Report: ClamAV: msg-9454-234.html contains HTML.Phishing.Pay-36
> > > Report: ClamAV: msg-17765-74.html contains Email.Phishing.RB-1260
> > >
> > > But there are no Email.Phishing.RB-1222's in there anywhere.
> > >
> >
> > What do you get if you run
> >
> > sigtool --list-sigs|grep Email.Phishing.RB-1222
> >
> > Perhaps something amiss with the clamdb updates? Accidental dupe installs?
> >
> > Rick
>
> Given that running clamscan on the email file outside of MailScanner detects it
> as a virus, I've already conclusively proven clamav has the signature and it
> works properly.
>
> One observation, though, the specific test messages I used detected as 1221 not
> 1222, but they're all related.
>
> ecardspam1.eml: Email.Phishing.RB-1221 FOUND
> ecardspam2.eml: Email.Phishing.RB-1221 FOUND
> ecardspam3.eml: Email.Phishing.RB-1221 FOUND
>
> However, if you insist:
> # sigtool --list-sigs|grep Email.Phishing.RB-1222
> Email.Phishing.RB-1222
>
> Yes, it's there. Yes, clamscan can use it, and clamscan properly detects the
> messages as viruses when executed manually. No, clamav via MailScanner cannot
> detect it.
>
Could this perhaps have anything to do with how clam gets fed the
message in MailScanner....? If I'm not completely senile (always a
possibility:-), MS doesn't feed it the complete message, hence some
newstyle sigs will never (be able to) trigger.
Cheers
--
-- Glenn
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list