BarricadeMX experiences

[Res]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Steve Freegard wrote:

> Now - who is quoting figures without basis.  Have *you* done two separate 
> tests on the same million or so mails and published the results like you 
> asked of the original poster?

Since the OP essentially spammed this list (it is after all MailScanner 
list, not BMX list, how long do you think anyone would last here if they 
conducted a conversation advertising MIMEDefang), he sprouted figures 
I simply showed that I don't need to goto commercial apps to have a tight
network, it's one of the reasons we got rid of that sophos implementation 
a few years back, and more recently ironport. Using milters, feeding the 
same crud into it over a week, MailScanner still came out ahead, it beats 
MIMEDefang only in efficiency of handling large continual concurrent 
connections.


-- 
Cheers
Res
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGqRW4sWhAmSIQh7MRAi/iAKCRewbjv6iKefmSMe7PGtrdfW0xrgCfWz1k
RSdRPyKwkcvMsQ8qppCsPZ8=
=trrA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----