Request for comments 3

UxBoD uxbod at splatnix.net
Wed Jul 25 20:43:58 IST 2007


True Hugo. Valid point hence posing question for comments :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hugo van der Kooij" <hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org>
To: "MailScanner discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Sent: 25 July 2007 18:47:06 o'clock (GMT) Europe/London
Subject: Re: Request for comments 3

On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, UxBoD wrote:

> Nope.  Just based on the new SA functionality, as Virri should never be released anyway, only other stuff is RBL so that would be subject to others comments.

Anyone using ClamAV might have a false positive on a perfectly good 
message. It is unlikely but definitly not impossible if one uses 
additional sets that are totally geared towards SPAM instead of MalWare.

Hugo.

-- 
 	hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org	http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
 	    This message is using 100% recycled electrons.

 	Some men see computers as they are and say "Windows"
 	I use computers with Linux and say "Why Windows?"
 		(Thanks JFK, for the insight.)
-- 
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website! 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



More information about the MailScanner mailing list