Request for comments 3
UxBoD
uxbod at splatnix.net
Mon Jul 23 20:30:40 IST 2007
Cool. Thanks Jules. Have a great HR application for it :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Julian Field" <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: "MailScanner discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Sent: 23 July 2007 16:49:26 o'clock (GMT) Europe/London
Subject: Re: Request for comments 3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Eventually yes. I want to get the design and code all working and
settled for spam first though.
UxBoD wrote:
> Would this new functionality extend to MCP aswell Jules ?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Julian Field" <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk>
> To: "MailScanner discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 4:24:40 PM (GMT) Europe/London
> Subject: Re: Request for comments 3
>
>
> * PGP Signed by an unmatched address: 07/23/07 at 16:24:41
>
>
>
> John Wilcock wrote:
>
>> Julian Field wrote:
>>
>>> How about this instead?
>>>
>>> SpamAssassin Rule Actions = rulename=>action, rulename=>action, ....
>>>
>>> the "rulename"s are the names of individual SpamAssassin rules, and
>>> the "action"s are list those in "Spam Actions". To specify multiple
>>> actions for a rule, you specify the rulename several times, with one
>>> action for each. Expressions with SpamAssassin rules are done with
>>> SpamAssassin meta-rules. If the rule hits, the action is taken.
>>>
>>> I'll write a few examples of meta-rules so you can see how to write
>>> them in spam.assassin.rules.conf or wherever they need to go. Mr
>>> Kettler, can you correct me on this please?
>>>
>>> Does this sound more useful than the previous suggestions?
>>>
>> Sounds good, yes.
>>
>> Are the actions intended to *replace* the default non spam, spam or
>> high scoring spam actions, or are they taken in *addition* to those
>> actions?
>>
> In addition.
>
>> IMO additional actions would be more flexible, but would need the
>> ability to negate an action, i.e. take a particular action by default
>> *unless* such-and-such rule hits.
>>
> Hmmm..... That makes life a bit more complicated. If I evaluated them
> after the existing rules then I should be able to do that. Good point
> though.
>
>
>> Non Spam Actions = deliver
>> Spam Actions = deliver,store
>> High Scoring Spam Actions = store
>>
>> SpamAssassin Rule Actions =
>> MY_BADSPAM_RULE=>not-store,
>> MY_SPECIAL_RULE=>forward theboss at domain
>>
>> John.
>>
>>
>
> Jules
>
>
Jules
- --
Julian Field MEng CITP
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
MailScanner customisation, or any advanced system administration help?
Contact me at Jules at Jules.FM
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.2 (Build 2014)
Charset: UTF-8
wj8DBQFGpM4HEfZZRxQVtlQRAtS6AKDUpySRq4q0UjPCSSBVXfvKShDp5QCg0FUG
SXu6PoIfnvVbMfwT5D0UmnI=
=cxkm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk
--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list