MS Wiki and split recipients

DAve dave.list at pixelhammer.com
Mon Jul 23 19:41:22 IST 2007


Scott Silva wrote:
> DAve spake the following on 7/23/2007 9:05 AM:
>> Scott Silva wrote:
>>> DAve spake the following on 7/23/2007 7:03 AM:
>>>> Matt Hampton wrote:
>>>>> DAve wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> and I noticed an addendum. I don't think the addendum will work as
>>>>>> stated. I believe following the addendum instructions will cause
>>>>>> Sendmail to accept only messages with a single recipient.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can someone confirm that, or clue bat me, as the case may be.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I think you are right (I re-wrote the original page and hadn't noticed
>>>>> the addendum).
>>>>>
>>>>> What it will cause is sendmail will accept the first recipient and then
>>>>> temp fail the rest.  This would cause the message to require X attempts
>>>>> to deliver the message (where X is the number of recipients).
>>>>>
>>>>> matt
>>>> Do we know who added that? Can it be removed or correctly annotated? It
>>>> would cause every message MailScanner sees to be single recipient, but
>>>> at a high cost. My listmail software would be unhappy sending to some of
>>>> our client's internal mail lists with 100+ subscribers.
>>>>
>>>> DAve
>>>>
>>> If you are logged in you can see who made each change with the old
>>> revisions
>>> button, and even revert to an older page.
>>>
>> Looks like I will need a login then. I'll make a note to fix it when I
>> get back to working on the test MS server.
>>
>> DAve
>>
> I can fix it if you give me an idea of where the error is. My sendmail is
> rather moldy.
> 

I would remove the addendum completely, it is not a solution for the 
problem on that page.

DAve

-- 
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos
for other non-international holidays, but nothing for
Veterans?

Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible.


More information about the MailScanner mailing list