Request for comments 3

[UxBoD]

Okay.  Will run through the MS config over next few days and see what structure can come up with.  Needs to be portable between different SQL formats including DBM hash.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Julian Field" <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: "MailScanner discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Sent: 22 July 2007 21:08:55 o'clock (GMT) Europe/London
Subject: Re: Request for comments 3

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In which case, please help me out and tell me what sort of database 
structure you would like to see. I don't use any of these control panel 
products, and so I have little idea how one might structure a 
configuration database. That's mostly why it hasn't already happened.

UxBoD wrote:
> Jules,
>
> I gather from your tone that SQL integration is at the bottom of your list, but in the same manner I see that the recent RFC is not at the top of peoples agenda.
>
> With that said it would be certainly interesting to see how people would like MailScanner to develop in the future. Your work is second to none, and with your expertise your product will become even greater.
>
> With other products (O/S solutions) going down the SQL route for tighter integration then I do believe that now is the time to harness the technology and catapult a superb product forward.
>
> Integration is the key, you have already done this with commercial and O/S products, but now MS needs to integrate with the control panel. Flat files are fast and efficient, but controlling via a panel is a different breed all together. Permissions etc are a real pain on flat files.
>
> This is my own personal view, but one I believe is expressed through others from what I can see.
>
> M/S rocks and gets better and better, but perhaps now a distributed solution should be looked at aswell.
>
> My time would certainly help is this quest. FSL take on it is very clever using a Broadcast/Multicast approach, perhaps that sort of technology could be encapsulated within M/S ?
>
> Greatest Regards Jules,
>
> --[ UxBoD ]--
> // PGP Key: "curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import"
> // Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854  36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
> // Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
> // Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: uxbod at sip.splatnix.net
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Julian Field" <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk>
> To: "MailScanner discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> Sent: 22 July 2007 19:39:13 o'clock (GMT) Europe/London
> Subject: Re: Request for comments 3
>
>
> * PGP Signed by an unmatched address: 07/22/07 at 19:39:14
>
> I'm just starting thinking about SQL, I'm not starting implementing yet. 
> I want to finish the chat about the SpamAssassin Rules Actions first.
>
> How about one of you guys start work on a database design for me. 
> Remember I need ordered rulesets and Custom Functions.
>
> But can we concentrate on the SpamAssassin Rules Actions for now, please.
>
> Jules.
>
> Jules
>
>   

Jules

- -- 
Julian Field MEng CITP
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

MailScanner customisation, or any advanced system administration help?
Contact me at Jules at Jules.FM

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.2 (Build 2014)
Charset: UTF-8

wj8DBQFGo7lXEfZZRxQVtlQRAocnAKCjfjy3ZHEIYXJKEYKift5Q6GiXdwCgjfhX
2mmyWpK3IM2CBJz/zYdNWl4=
=zcWC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk

--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.