Request for comments 3

[UxBoD]

LDAP is quite heavy compared to DBM and a lite MySQL installation.  Plus, SQL calls over local net is far better IMHO and easier for people aswell. Just my 2p worth Jules.  More people know SQL coding.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Julian Field" <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: "MailScanner discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Sent: 22 July 2007 17:34:13 o'clock (GMT) Europe/London
Subject: Re: Request for comments 3

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



UxBoD wrote:
> depends on how many rules people create Jules.  If a lot then you may hit a limit within MailScanner.conf for a single line to parse.
There aren't any limits on the length of the lines.
>   DBM or SQLquery would be great for this ;) (hint,hint)
>   
You can do this already with LDAP. The structure of the LDAP tree has 
been posted to this list before (a long time ago).

> --[ UxBoD ]--
> // PGP Key: "curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import"
> // Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854  36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
> // Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
> // Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: uxbod at sip.splatnix.net
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Julian Field" <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk>
> To: "MailScanner discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> Sent: 22 July 2007 17:06:11 o'clock (GMT) Europe/London
> Subject: Re: Request for comments 3
>
>
> * PGP Signed by an unmatched address: 07/22/07 at 17:06:12
>
>
>
> Alex Broens wrote:
>   
>> On 7/22/2007 5:13 PM, Julian Field wrote:
>>     
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> How about this instead?
>>>
>>> SpamAssassin Rule Actions = rulename=>action, rulename=>action, ....
>>>
>>> the "rulename"s are the names of individual SpamAssassin rules, and 
>>> the "action"s are list those in "Spam Actions". To specify multiple 
>>> actions for a rule, you specify the rulename several times, with one 
>>> action for each. Expressions with SpamAssassin rules are done with 
>>> SpamAssassin meta-rules. If the rule hits, the action is taken.
>>>       
>> Yeah. sounds real nice!
>>
>>     
>>> I'll write a few examples of meta-rules so you can see how to write 
>>> them in spam.assassin.rules.conf or wherever they need to go. Mr 
>>> Kettler, can you correct me on this please?
>>>       
>> may I suggest the name:
>>
>> sa.actions.rules.conf?
>>     
> Why would it need a conf file of its own? I see it just as a 
> (potentially quite long) list of rulenames and actions to take.
> Or are you thinking of a conf file that looks like
> rulename   list-of-actions
> rulename   list-of-actions
> ....
> I'm not in favour of a separate conf file, it looks a bit over the top.
>
>   
>> so is not mistaken with pure SA rules.
>>
>>     
>>> Does this sound more useful than the previous suggestions?
>>>       
>> I see this as the "gateway-procmail" - very powerful
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>     
>
> Jules
>
>   

Jules

- -- 
Julian Field MEng CITP
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

MailScanner customisation, or any advanced system administration help?
Contact me at Jules at Jules.FM

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.2 (Build 2014)
Charset: UTF-8

wj8DBQFGo4cGEfZZRxQVtlQRArB0AKCd4qC1yG1t5pACMQGtJUK3iqd05ACfWR0l
7ZPDBUszy4FKtrSTjB8DDAE=
=/liW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk

--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.