Request for comments 3

[Julian Field]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



UxBoD wrote:
> That sounds pretty cool Jules. Would these rules take priority over the SA rules ?
? The rules referred to in this setting would be SA rules. It would use 
the results of the call to SA to get the list of "hits" that this 
setting would use.
>  So that based on a particular rule you could say quarantine straight away without any further processing ?
>
> --[ UxBoD ]--
> // PGP Key: "curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import"
> // Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854  36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
> // Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
> // Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: uxbod at sip.splatnix.net
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Julian Field" <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk>
> To: "MailScanner discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> Sent: 22 July 2007 16:13:34 o'clock (GMT) Europe/London
> Subject: Re: Request for comments 3
>
>
> * PGP Signed by an unmatched address: 07/22/07 at 16:13:35
>
> How about this instead?
>
> SpamAssassin Rule Actions = rulename=>action, rulename=>action, ....
>
> the "rulename"s are the names of individual SpamAssassin rules, and the 
> "action"s are list those in "Spam Actions". To specify multiple actions 
> for a rule, you specify the rulename several times, with one action for 
> each. Expressions with SpamAssassin rules are done with SpamAssassin 
> meta-rules. If the rule hits, the action is taken.
>
> I'll write a few examples of meta-rules so you can see how to write them 
> in spam.assassin.rules.conf or wherever they need to go. Mr Kettler, can 
> you correct me on this please?
>
> Does this sound more useful than the previous suggestions?
>
> Jules.
>
> Julian Field wrote:
>   
>>> Old Signed: 07/22/07 at 14:29:25
>>>       
>>
>> Matt Kettler wrote:
>>     
>>> Julian Field wrote:
>>>  
>>>       
>>>> That would be easy to add. Would many people use it?
>>>> It would just be an "Adjust SpamAssassin Score" configuration option.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> I don't think that would be useful Julian. If they wanted to adjust 
>>> the SA
>>> score, that's easy to do in SA. It's also not what Steven was 
>>> suggesting, at
>>> least as far as I can tell.
>>>   
>>>       
>> I agree with you here. Adding an SA rule to tweak the score based on 
>> simple things like the sender address is pretty easy to do. If you 
>> don't know how to do it, then read 'man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf' will 
>> tell you most of what you need to do, and a quick look for an envelope 
>> rule in /usr/share/spamassassin will give you plenty of examples.
>>
>> I don't want to waste time and resources on things that SA already 
>> does perfectly well.
>>
>> Jules
>>
>>     
>
> Jules
>
>   

Jules

- -- 
Julian Field MEng CITP
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

MailScanner customisation, or any advanced system administration help?
Contact me at Jules at Jules.FM

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.2 (Build 2014)
Charset: UTF-8

wj8DBQFGo4DOEfZZRxQVtlQRAp8nAJ0YQ3H1EioSB7HNqB45uLtncxQrmACg69KI
RospUHOXalVwP04dto26Pf4=
=Saw6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk