Watermarking
UxBoD
uxbod at splatnix.net
Thu Jul 19 19:44:19 IST 2007
IMHO it should bypass SPAM but not Virii checks.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Andrews" <sandrews at andrewscompanies.com>
To: "MailScanner discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 6:44:41 PM (GMT) Europe/London
Subject: RE: Watermarking
I guess it should be an option, but I can't see a reason you'd want to
bypass virus scan; just because it's a reply doesn't me it's not stuffed
full of virii.
-----Original Message-----
From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
[mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Chris
Yuzik
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 1:24 PM
To: MailScanner discussion
Subject: Re: Watermarking
UxBoD wrote:
> When watermarking is used in the latest version do the return emails
bypass both SPAM and Virus checks ?
> If so, would it be possible to make it only bypass SPAM, incase they
> have replied and added a Virus ;)
My understanding is that no, the replies bypass neither SPAM nor virus
checks. Personally, I'd like that option, but it doesn't seem to be one
of the features (yet? Julian?).
Chris
--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list