Watermarking

UxBoD uxbod at splatnix.net
Thu Jul 19 19:44:19 IST 2007


IMHO it should bypass SPAM but not Virii checks.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Andrews" <sandrews at andrewscompanies.com>
To: "MailScanner discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 6:44:41 PM (GMT) Europe/London
Subject: RE: Watermarking

I guess it should be an option, but I can't see a reason you'd want to
bypass virus scan; just because it's a reply doesn't me it's not stuffed
full of virii. 

-----Original Message-----
From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
[mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Chris
Yuzik
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 1:24 PM
To: MailScanner discussion
Subject: Re: Watermarking

UxBoD wrote:
> When watermarking is used in the latest version do the return emails
bypass both SPAM and Virus checks ?
> If so, would it be possible to make it only bypass SPAM, incase they 
> have replied and added a Virus ;)

My understanding is that no, the replies bypass neither SPAM nor virus
checks. Personally, I'd like that option, but it doesn't seem to be one
of the features (yet? Julian?).

Chris


--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website! 
--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



More information about the MailScanner mailing list