Watermarking returns+ graphical signatures

[Ed Bruce]

Sattler, Tim wrote:
> Julian Field wrote:
> 
>> Firstly, the watermarking functionality has returned. But this time it
> 
>> is implemented differently so is safe from all patent problems. It is 
>> implemented in pretty much the same way that milter-null does it.
> 
> We have two MailScanner gateways both handling incoming and outgoing 
> mail, so the reply to a message does not necessarily come in the 
> same way the message went out. Does the watermarking functionality 
> work in such a setup as well?
> 
> Thanks
> Tim

I have similiar situation. We have two MS gateways. One handles incoming
and outgoing, the other only incoming. On the server that only handles
incoming is where I will install this beta and try out the watermarking.
When this introduce any problems. One server running with watermarking
and the other not?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 249 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20070713/80b7f1d6/signature.bin