dcc,razor,pyzor on MS running centos4.4

[Peter Nitschke]

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 26/01/2007 at 2:37 AM Peter Nitschke wrote:

>On 25/01/2007 at 4:36 PM Glenn Steen wrote:
>
>>> >Start looking at (MAQ):
>>>
>>>http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=maq:index#spamassassin_plugins
_
>and
>>> _bayes
>>> >And also (wiki):
>>>
>>>http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=&idx=documentation:anti_spam
:
>spama
>>> ssassin:plugins
>>>
>>> Is that stuff still current?  On my new Centos 4 setup I simply used
>"yum
>>> install perl-Razor-Agent pyzor DCC"
>>>
>>> The last 2 are from atrpms.net
>>>
>>> I then commented out the lines in spam.assassin.prefs.conf: (I got lint
>>> errors if I left them in)
>>> # pyzor path
>>> # DCC path
>>>
>>> Last I made sure the relevant lines in v310.pre were uncommented.
>>>
>>> Bingo, instant razor, pyzor and DCC.
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>Since they detail how to use the f^Hsource, I presume they are OK.
>>If you want to use RPMs and yum, and feel this should be mentioned in
>>the wiki... why then... feel free to update the wiki pages with this
>>additional info;-). After all, that is what a wiki is all about:-D
>>
>>That you get errors about some lines regarding pyzor and DCC might be
>>indicative that you aren't loading the plugins properly... Have you
>>checked (with a spamassassin -D) that they load/execute as they
>>should? See, SpamAssassin doesn'ät know about those settings.... the
>>individual plugins do though;-). So if you had done thinsg the other
>>way around (load plugins uncommented, then --lint) things might've
>>looked differently;)
>
>I just tested it again, the pyzor_path is actually OK and DCC_path is also
>OK if I change it from /usr/local/bin to /usr/bin - the rpm put dccproc in
>a different place.
>
>However, I am curious as to why the settings are needed as it actually
>worked and linted fine with the lines commented out.
>
>Now that they are plugins, are the path lines still needed?

Can anyone verify this for me please?