New Beta 4.58.6 released

[Glenn Steen]

On 29/01/07, Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>
> Gerard Seibert wrote:
> > On Monday January 29, 2007 at 04:00:48 (AM) Glenn Steen wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 29/01/07, Mike Jakubik <mikej at rogers.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Julian Field wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> There was 1 serious bug in 4.58.5 which I have now hopefully fixed.
> >>>>
> >>>> *Please* give this version a try as I don't intend changing anything
> >>>> before the 1st Feb stable release unless you notify me of any problems
> >>>> or bugs.
> >>>>
> >>>> Support for the 'p' records in Postfix 2.3/2.4 will have to wait for
> >>>> the next release of MailScanner, personally I think it is a nasty
> >>>> bodge. I wouldn't be at all surprised if Weitse changed his mind on
> >>>> this topic, he certainly should do.
> >>>>
> >>> Julian,
> >>>
> >>> Could you give a little more detail as to what 'p' records are, and how
> >>> this will affect MS's compatibility with postfix?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >> Mike,
> >>
> >> Download the postfix source and read the comment in
> >> src/cleanup/cleanup_milter.c (starts on line 114 in the version 2.3.6
> >> sources). This is so far the best explanation of what it is I've
> >> found.
> >>
> >> If we manage to implement "support" for it correctly, it'll not change
> >> the support/non-support status of postfix one whit (Jules still
> >> supports it, Wietse will still see us as more evil than the horned
> >> devil for perusing the queue files directly... Well, perhaps not that
> >> evil, but close:-).
> >>
> >> We aim at making "milter edited queue files" -> "a (new) normal queue file".
> >>
> >> If you want my patches to look at beforehand, I can get them to you in
> >> a blink:-). So far they've been tested by me and Nerijus Baliunas (who
> >> is a brave soul and seems to be running them in production:-). They're
> >> good for 2.3 with milters, not yet 2.4 with body editing milters.
> >>
> >
> > I posted the original post regarding 'p' records on the Postfix forum,
> > and these are two of the responses that I received.
> >
> >
> > Software that depends on Postfix INTERNAL interfaces breaks the
> > warranty.
> Since when did his software come with a warranty? Ooohh, can I sue him
> please? Please?
>
> Jules
>
ROFL!
Thanks Jules... Really needed that today. Oh well, enough play... Back
to playing at being a plumber... (Sometimes I really don't like my
house:)

-- 
-- Glenn
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se