New Year's Resolution and new beta release

[Ken A]

Glenn Steen wrote:
> On 04/01/07, Ken A <ka at pacific.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Julian Field wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > I have also figured out how to get the configuration system to call a
>> > ruleset from within a Custom Function. So if you want to handle some
>> > situations with a Custom Function, but then have that use a ruleset 
>> some
>> > of the time, you can now do it. It is something I never dreamed up when
>> > I was writing it, so it is pulling a stunt I never thought I would 
>> need.
>> > I have produced a stripped-down example of how to do it, and the 
>> code is
>> > in the /usr/lib/MailScanner/MailScanner/CustomFunctions directory, 
>> along
>> > with the other few examples I provide you to start from.
>> >
>>
>> So, regarding Custom Functions in general:
>>
>> # Your function may be passed a "message" object...
>> # If you want to find out what there is in a "message" object,
>> # look at Message.pm as they are all listed there.
>>
>> Message.pm lists things like $spamreport (set by IsSpam) as well as the
>> things I'd expect to see available to a 'message object' (message
>> headers, body, etc).
>>
>> Does a 'message object' ever contain $spamreport?
>> If so, then for which configuration options in MailScanner.conf could I
>> call a custom function that might have access to $spamreport?
>>
>> Or am I missing the flow of things completely? :-(
>>
> At least the Always Looked Up Last thing... That's where MailWatch gets it.

Ah, that makes sense! :-)
I should probably just do some testing and see what happens. (kaboom).
Hope you get feeling better too!
Thanks!
Ken A.
Pacific.Net