Postfix Queue question

Gerard Seibert gerard at seibercom.net
Fri Feb 23 19:27:14 CET 2007


On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:05:22 -0800
Jay Chandler <chandler.lists at chapman.edu> wrote:

> > why dont u guys use an MTA that works without the constant dramas ;)
> > like sendmail or qmail :P
> >  
> Because I have both the O'Reilly Sendmail and Postfix books in my
> cube. The Postfix book takes a couple hours to get through, while the
> Sendmail book is mainly here to kill hobos with-- this thing is
> MASSIVE.
> 
> There's something to be said for simplicity...

Absolutely. The O'Reilly 'Sendmail' book is 1205+ pages. The 'Book of
Postfix' is only 464 pages. Plus, you can actually set up SASL and
SSL/TLS in Postfix after reading it. Setting up SASL and SSL/TLS etc. in
Sendmail can be a chore. The users of Sendmail have been decreasing
while the users of alternative MTA's like Postfix, have been on the
rise. Then again, there is Qmail, which is not even officially
supported but still available for the adventurous.

-- 
Gerard
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20070223/15c59dff/signature.bin


More information about the MailScanner mailing list