Do others see this effect in their maillogs?

[Scott Silva]

Duncan, Brian M. spake the following on 2/12/2007 9:56 AM:
> 
> 
>> It looks as if it is telling you which list it hit.
>> Do you have anything set in the following?
>> # If a message appears in at least this number of "Spam
> 
>> Lists" (as defined # above), then the message will be treated
> 
>> as spam and so the "Spam # Actions" will happen, unless the
> 
>> message reaches the levels for "High # Scoring Spam". By
> 
>> default this is set to 1 to mimic the previous # behavior,
> 
>> which means that appearing in any "Spam Lists" will cause #
> 
>> the message to be treated as spam.
>> # This can also be the filename of a ruleset.
>> Spam Lists To Be Spam = 0
>>
> 
> 
> Thanks for the info, I do understand that. 
> 
> 
> The problem is it's missing text in the maillog. (At least I think it
> is)
> 
> Let me show examples, but shorten them to get my point across better:
> 
> Portion of message in mail log that fails due to SpamAssassin:
> 
> to kattenlaw.com is spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=19.049
> 
> Portion of message in mail log that fails due to RBL:
> 
> to kattenlaw.com is cbl, MAPS-ALL, zen.spamhaus.org
> 
> Notice that the word spam is missing in the RBL failure message?
> 
> 
> Should it not read: to kattenlaw.com is spam, cbl, MAPS-ALL,
> zen.spamhaus.org
> 
> 
> 
> I hope that makes it more clear.
OK. Have a look at this setting;
# If the message sender is on any of the Spam Lists, do you still want
# to do the SpamAssassin checks? Setting this to "no" will reduce the load
# on your server, but will stop the High Scoring Spam Actions from ever
# happening.
# This can also be the filename of a ruleset.
Check SpamAssassin If On Spam List = yes



-- 

MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!